Pay for Performance why it doesn't work in the Workplace Essay

Pay for Performance why it doesnt work in the Workplace - Essay ExampleTo show the extensive use of the reward system, the write writes on victimization rewards to recognize teamwork, monetary rewards for employees for undertaking trainings and gaining new skills.The author states that rewards often impede than they rise performance on m apiece tasks with specific emphasis to those that require creativity with the example of Japan and Germany countries that do not use reward incentives and are successful in employee motivation. The other further explores the fact that in that respect are no empirical studies linking motivation to rewards showing poor implementation of compensation systems. In fact, enquiry by Jenkins in 1986 shows no relation between quality performance and rewards (p 124). In a baptistry where incentives were withdrawn, production decreased then after sometime rose to reach a better aim than when there were incentives further showing that incentives do not mot ivate workers for quality or higher productivity (p 124).The author then delves into the reasons for the distress of incentives including lack of necessity that is the introduction of incentives unnecessarily resulting in lack of any impact on performance. The second reason is secrecy where there is no transparency on each employees earning leading to overestimation and belief of differences in pay resulting in low morale and turmoil at the workplace. Other reasons are lack of match between performances and pay and expense in rewards solved via using noncash rewards. The other reason is too big versus too small incentives where small incentives do not comport an impact while large ones are not received by all the workers resulting in failure of incentives to motivate performance. Short-term versus long-term incentives are the other reasons for incentives failure where employees may make decisions countering long-term interests when incentives junior-grade on short-term performan ce. Objectivity versus subjectivity,